Ivan. P. Buleev, Yaroslav S. Bryukhovetsky, LiliyaV. Ivanenko, 78_05
Wednesday, 14 June 2017 03:33 | Author: Покотиленко Р.В. | 
Ivan. P. Buleev
Doctor of Economics, profesor, The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Yaroslav S. Bryukhovetsky
The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
LiliyaV. Ivanenko
The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Modelling of increase in in-tellectualization level of employees’ labour
Section: Social and economic problems of development of industry
Ekon. promisl. 2017, 78(2): 80-96
https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2017.02.080
Language: Russian
| Full text (PDF)
| References:
1.Jacobson, Simon F. The IoT In Manufacturing Operations: Where Are We Now? Retrieved from http://www.gartner. com/webinar/3447518?srcId=1-3931087981.
2.Chernobrovtsev, A. (2016). Smart Company 2016: Digital transformation – Russian industry. Computerworld Rossyya. Retrieved from http://www.computer-world.ru/articles/Smart-Company-2016-tsifrovaya-transformatsiya--rossiyskoy-promyshlennosti.
3.Hrishnova, O.A. (2000). Intellectu-alization of labor: Ukrainian problems in the context of global trends. Ukraine: aspekts of labor, 7, 24-27 [in Ukrainian].
4.Hrishnova, O.A. (2009). Intellectualization of labor: the defining a sign of post-industrial society. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Economics and Intellectual Property, 7, 147-150 [in Ukrainian].
5.Kolot, A. (2007). Innovative work and Intellectual capital In the system of factors forming the knowledge economy. Ukraine: aspekts of labor, 4, 4-9 [in Ukrainian].
6.Vasylyk, A.V. (2010). Modern ap-proaches to the motivation of the company employees intellectual activity. Formuvannya rynkovoyi ekonomiky: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Spetsial'nyy vypusk u 3 tomakh. Sot-sialno-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriya i praktyka. Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, 124-132 [in Ukrainian].
7.Tsymbalyuk, S.O. (2015). New vectors for development of compensation policy under conditions of transformation of socio-labor relations. Business Inform, 4, 169-174 [in Ukrainian].
8.Bazylevych, V. (2005). Intellectual and personalization - the basis of the formation of a new paradigm of classical university education in economics and management in the context of the Bologna Process. Vyshcha shkola, 6, 28-43 [in Ukrainian].
9.Sytnyk, Y.S. (2013). Development of scientific potential of ukraine as a precondition of economic andmanagement intellectualization. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu ‘Lvivska politekhnika, 754, 75-86 [in Ukrainian].
10.Buleev, I.P., Buleev, E.I., Ata-manchuk, H.S., & Revva, A.N. (2012). Motivation of labor in the industry: theory and practice. Buleev I.P. (Ed.) Donetsk: The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine. 338 p. [in Russian].
11.Buleev, I.P., Bryukhovetskaya, N.Yu., & Atamanchuk, H.S. (2010). Institutional aspects of the labor motivation in the industrial enterprise. Formuvannya rynkovoyi ekonomiky: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Spets. vypusk: Sotsial'no-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriya i praktyka. Buleev I.P. (Ed.). Kyiv: KNEU , 518-532 [in Ukrainian].
12.Bryukhovetskaya, N.Yu., & Chorna, O.A. (2009). Institutional factors of development the companies human capital. Stratehiya i mekhanizmy rehulyuvannya promyslovoho rozvytku. Donetck. 26-44 [in Ukrainian].
13.Ivanenko, L.V. (2013). The company's social indicators formation. Visnik Doneckogo universitetu ekonomiki i prava. 2(2013), 183-189 [in Ukrainian].
14.Bryukhovetskyi, Ya.S. (2012). Motivation of staff in the innovative devel-opment of industrial enterprises. Stratehiya i mekhanizmy rehulyuvannya promyslovoho rozvytku. Doneck. 240-249 [in Ukrainian].
15.Bohynja, D.P. (2015). Labor productivity in engineering as a factor of production efficiency (18 years). Herald of Khmelnytskyi national university, 4(2), 81-85 [in Ukrainian].
16.Doronina, M.S., Sasina, L.O., Luhova, V.M., & Nadon, H.O. (2010). The mechanism of motivation managerial staff. Monograph. Charkiv: ChNEU. [in Ukrainian].
17.Lepa, R.N., Russiyan, E.A., Abaeva, E.N., & Omelchenko, S.N. (2014). Personal management of industrial enter-prises: concepts, mechanisms, models and methods: monograph. Lviv: Vidavnitstvo «BONA», 387 pp. [in Ukrainian].
18.Novikova, O.F., Amosha, O.I., & Antonjuk, V.P. (2009). Human potential: mechanisms of the conservation and the development. Ukraine: aspekts of labor. 2. 50 pp. [in Ukrainian].
19.Antonjuk, V.P. (2007). The formation and using the human capital in Ukraine: the social and economic evaluation and development. Donetsk: Institute of Industry of Ukraine NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
20.Zaloznova, Yu.S. (2010). Development of Human Capital as a Condition for Improving Competitiveness of Coal Industry. Regional economy, 3, 230-236 [in Ukrainian].
21.Zakharova O.V., & Kovalenko T.V. (2012). Evaluation of the Influence of the Investments in Human Capital on the General Result of the Activities of the Enterprise. Business Inform, 4, 150-154 [in Ukrainian].
22.Shvets, I.B., & Fedorenko, T.S. (2013). The modern trends of professional lifelong learning. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Donbasu, 1, 208-215 [in Ukrainian].
23.Khromov, M.I. (2010). Investments in human capital: features of category and criteria for estimation of effectiveness. Ekon. promisl., 2, 188-195. [in Ukrainian].
24.Iastremska, O.M., & Syvash, Ju.M. (2014). Synaptic as a method of enhancing creative thinking of staff. The problems of economy, 2, 219-223 [in Ukrainian].
25.Koch, M.J., McGrath, R.G. (1996). Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic management journal, 335-354. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266 (199605)17:5<335::AID-SMJ814>3.0.CO;2-R
26.Wright, P.M., Dunford, B.B., & Snell, S.A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of management, 6 (27), 701-721. DOI: 10.1177/014920630102700607
27.Yudyna, S.V. (2012). Motivation of intellectual workers. Perm University Herald. Economy, 3. 82-89 [in Russian].
28.Sharp, H., Hall, T., Baddoo, N., & Beecham, S. (2007). Exploring motivational differences between software developers and project managers. The 6th Joint Meeting on European software en-gineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium
on the foundations of software engineering: companion papers. Retrieved from https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/2299/990/1/S71.pdf.
29.Vasylyk, A.V. (2009). The labour activity intellectualization in the context of intellectual capital forming and development. Manuscript. Kyiv: KNEU. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].
30.The World Bank (2016, August 10). World Development Indicators. Retri¬eved from http://datacatalog.worldbank.org/
31.Amosha, A.Y., Vyshnevskyj, V.P., Zbarazska, L.A. (2012). Neoindustrialization and new industrial policy. Ekon. promisl., 1-2, 3-33 [in Russian].
32.Vyshnevskyj, V.P. (Ed.) (2014). Industry and industrial policy of Ukraine 2013: current trends, challenges, opportunities: scientific and annual report. Part I. Ekon. promisl., 2 (66), 80-131 [in Russian].
33.State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Ukraine in Figures: 2015. In I.M. Zuk (Ed.) [in Ukrainian].
34.State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2011). The use of ICT in the Ukraine. Statistical bulletin Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
35.State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). The use of ICT in the Ukraine. Statistical bulletin Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
36.Subbotyna, I.Y. (2013). Forming of qualitative human capital: selection, motivation and the intellectualization of labor resources. Journal of economic regulation, 4, 55-62.
37.Mochernyy, S.V. (Ed.) (2000). Economic encyclopedia: in 3 volumes. V. 3 Kyiv: Vydavnychyy tsentr “Akademiya”. 864 p.
38.Fedoseev, V.V., Garmash, A.N., & Dayitbergov, D.M. (1999). Economic and mathematical methods and applied models: a scientific manual for universities. YuNITI, 391 pp.
39.Horfynkel, V.Ja., & Shvandara, V.A. (2007). Enterprise economy: a scientific manual for universities. JuNYTY-DANA. 670 pp.
Doctor of Economics, profesor, The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Yaroslav S. Bryukhovetsky
The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
LiliyaV. Ivanenko
The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Modelling of increase in in-tellectualization level of employees’ labour
Section: Social and economic problems of development of industry
Ekon. promisl. 2017, 78(2): 80-96
https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2017.02.080
Language: Russian
Abstract:
The introduction and development of technologies into the production of information and communication lead to accelerating the processes of intellectualization of labour in Ukraine. Increased disparities in innovative development, downswing in production and capital investment, decline in real wages are accompanied by an increase of salary level of computerization jobs and increasing use of Internet technologies in administrative activity in Ukraine. In this connection there is a need to investigate the methods, models and tools for improving the intellectualization of the labour in the conditions of such imbalances.
The purpose of the article is to develop the scientific and methodological approach to modelling the increase in intellectualization level of employees’ labour in accordance with the modern trends of the economic development in Ukraine. It is shown in the article that for the achievement of the efficiency of industrial enterprises in a wide spread of information and communication technologies, as well as constant updating of software products it is essential not only the presence of employees with certain knowledge, skills and experience but also their constant self-education and development.
The need to process large volumes of data using universal and specific software systems and applications requires constant development of the sphere of competence of specialists or improvement of intellectualization of the labour. Increasing the intellectualization of the labour reduces the complexity of certain operations by speeding up their implementation simultaneously reducing the labour costs. Acceleration of the basic production processes by increasing intellectualization of the labour must fully compensate for downtime during trainings. The effective system of motivational payments provides such compensation.
Specific traditional businesses material incentives do not account for the transformation of the content and nature of work, which takes place in the process of intellectualization. Consequently, the stimulating effect of motivational payments is not enough to improve the efficiency of labour. Decision-making and ensuring their effectiveness in the process of management of the labour intellectualization requires such a distribution of the number of employees in terms of intellectualization, which would ensure the maximum return on the accepted motivation at the enterprise. Achieving this is possible by formulating and solving mathematical programming problems choosing the optimal number of employees’ distribution by intellectualization categories, which would ensure the maximization of the number of operations performed for a fixed wage fund or minimize payroll for a given volume of transactions.
Statistical evaluation indicators have been received during the timing of work and per-formance of employees of various categories of labour intellectualization. In the article the model of optimal (mathematical) programming of employees’ distribution according to the level of labour intellectualization at enterprises has been justified and implemented.
Keywords: intellectualization of labour, modelling of increase in intellectualization of labour at enterprises, intellectualization level of labour, model of employees’ distribution according to level of labour intellectualization.
JEL: J24, D290.
The introduction and development of technologies into the production of information and communication lead to accelerating the processes of intellectualization of labour in Ukraine. Increased disparities in innovative development, downswing in production and capital investment, decline in real wages are accompanied by an increase of salary level of computerization jobs and increasing use of Internet technologies in administrative activity in Ukraine. In this connection there is a need to investigate the methods, models and tools for improving the intellectualization of the labour in the conditions of such imbalances.
The purpose of the article is to develop the scientific and methodological approach to modelling the increase in intellectualization level of employees’ labour in accordance with the modern trends of the economic development in Ukraine. It is shown in the article that for the achievement of the efficiency of industrial enterprises in a wide spread of information and communication technologies, as well as constant updating of software products it is essential not only the presence of employees with certain knowledge, skills and experience but also their constant self-education and development.
The need to process large volumes of data using universal and specific software systems and applications requires constant development of the sphere of competence of specialists or improvement of intellectualization of the labour. Increasing the intellectualization of the labour reduces the complexity of certain operations by speeding up their implementation simultaneously reducing the labour costs. Acceleration of the basic production processes by increasing intellectualization of the labour must fully compensate for downtime during trainings. The effective system of motivational payments provides such compensation.
Specific traditional businesses material incentives do not account for the transformation of the content and nature of work, which takes place in the process of intellectualization. Consequently, the stimulating effect of motivational payments is not enough to improve the efficiency of labour. Decision-making and ensuring their effectiveness in the process of management of the labour intellectualization requires such a distribution of the number of employees in terms of intellectualization, which would ensure the maximum return on the accepted motivation at the enterprise. Achieving this is possible by formulating and solving mathematical programming problems choosing the optimal number of employees’ distribution by intellectualization categories, which would ensure the maximization of the number of operations performed for a fixed wage fund or minimize payroll for a given volume of transactions.
Statistical evaluation indicators have been received during the timing of work and per-formance of employees of various categories of labour intellectualization. In the article the model of optimal (mathematical) programming of employees’ distribution according to the level of labour intellectualization at enterprises has been justified and implemented.
Keywords: intellectualization of labour, modelling of increase in intellectualization of labour at enterprises, intellectualization level of labour, model of employees’ distribution according to level of labour intellectualization.
JEL: J24, D290.
| Full text (PDF)
| References:
1.Jacobson, Simon F. The IoT In Manufacturing Operations: Where Are We Now? Retrieved from http://www.gartner. com/webinar/3447518?srcId=1-3931087981.
2.Chernobrovtsev, A. (2016). Smart Company 2016: Digital transformation – Russian industry. Computerworld Rossyya. Retrieved from http://www.computer-world.ru/articles/Smart-Company-2016-tsifrovaya-transformatsiya--rossiyskoy-promyshlennosti.
3.Hrishnova, O.A. (2000). Intellectu-alization of labor: Ukrainian problems in the context of global trends. Ukraine: aspekts of labor, 7, 24-27 [in Ukrainian].
4.Hrishnova, O.A. (2009). Intellectualization of labor: the defining a sign of post-industrial society. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Economics and Intellectual Property, 7, 147-150 [in Ukrainian].
5.Kolot, A. (2007). Innovative work and Intellectual capital In the system of factors forming the knowledge economy. Ukraine: aspekts of labor, 4, 4-9 [in Ukrainian].
6.Vasylyk, A.V. (2010). Modern ap-proaches to the motivation of the company employees intellectual activity. Formuvannya rynkovoyi ekonomiky: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Spetsial'nyy vypusk u 3 tomakh. Sot-sialno-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriya i praktyka. Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, 124-132 [in Ukrainian].
7.Tsymbalyuk, S.O. (2015). New vectors for development of compensation policy under conditions of transformation of socio-labor relations. Business Inform, 4, 169-174 [in Ukrainian].
8.Bazylevych, V. (2005). Intellectual and personalization - the basis of the formation of a new paradigm of classical university education in economics and management in the context of the Bologna Process. Vyshcha shkola, 6, 28-43 [in Ukrainian].
9.Sytnyk, Y.S. (2013). Development of scientific potential of ukraine as a precondition of economic andmanagement intellectualization. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu ‘Lvivska politekhnika, 754, 75-86 [in Ukrainian].
10.Buleev, I.P., Buleev, E.I., Ata-manchuk, H.S., & Revva, A.N. (2012). Motivation of labor in the industry: theory and practice. Buleev I.P. (Ed.) Donetsk: The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine. 338 p. [in Russian].
11.Buleev, I.P., Bryukhovetskaya, N.Yu., & Atamanchuk, H.S. (2010). Institutional aspects of the labor motivation in the industrial enterprise. Formuvannya rynkovoyi ekonomiky: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Spets. vypusk: Sotsial'no-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriya i praktyka. Buleev I.P. (Ed.). Kyiv: KNEU , 518-532 [in Ukrainian].
12.Bryukhovetskaya, N.Yu., & Chorna, O.A. (2009). Institutional factors of development the companies human capital. Stratehiya i mekhanizmy rehulyuvannya promyslovoho rozvytku. Donetck. 26-44 [in Ukrainian].
13.Ivanenko, L.V. (2013). The company's social indicators formation. Visnik Doneckogo universitetu ekonomiki i prava. 2(2013), 183-189 [in Ukrainian].
14.Bryukhovetskyi, Ya.S. (2012). Motivation of staff in the innovative devel-opment of industrial enterprises. Stratehiya i mekhanizmy rehulyuvannya promyslovoho rozvytku. Doneck. 240-249 [in Ukrainian].
15.Bohynja, D.P. (2015). Labor productivity in engineering as a factor of production efficiency (18 years). Herald of Khmelnytskyi national university, 4(2), 81-85 [in Ukrainian].
16.Doronina, M.S., Sasina, L.O., Luhova, V.M., & Nadon, H.O. (2010). The mechanism of motivation managerial staff. Monograph. Charkiv: ChNEU. [in Ukrainian].
17.Lepa, R.N., Russiyan, E.A., Abaeva, E.N., & Omelchenko, S.N. (2014). Personal management of industrial enter-prises: concepts, mechanisms, models and methods: monograph. Lviv: Vidavnitstvo «BONA», 387 pp. [in Ukrainian].
18.Novikova, O.F., Amosha, O.I., & Antonjuk, V.P. (2009). Human potential: mechanisms of the conservation and the development. Ukraine: aspekts of labor. 2. 50 pp. [in Ukrainian].
19.Antonjuk, V.P. (2007). The formation and using the human capital in Ukraine: the social and economic evaluation and development. Donetsk: Institute of Industry of Ukraine NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
20.Zaloznova, Yu.S. (2010). Development of Human Capital as a Condition for Improving Competitiveness of Coal Industry. Regional economy, 3, 230-236 [in Ukrainian].
21.Zakharova O.V., & Kovalenko T.V. (2012). Evaluation of the Influence of the Investments in Human Capital on the General Result of the Activities of the Enterprise. Business Inform, 4, 150-154 [in Ukrainian].
22.Shvets, I.B., & Fedorenko, T.S. (2013). The modern trends of professional lifelong learning. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Donbasu, 1, 208-215 [in Ukrainian].
23.Khromov, M.I. (2010). Investments in human capital: features of category and criteria for estimation of effectiveness. Ekon. promisl., 2, 188-195. [in Ukrainian].
24.Iastremska, O.M., & Syvash, Ju.M. (2014). Synaptic as a method of enhancing creative thinking of staff. The problems of economy, 2, 219-223 [in Ukrainian].
25.Koch, M.J., McGrath, R.G. (1996). Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic management journal, 335-354. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266 (199605)17:5<335::AID-SMJ814>3.0.CO;2-R
26.Wright, P.M., Dunford, B.B., & Snell, S.A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of management, 6 (27), 701-721. DOI: 10.1177/014920630102700607
27.Yudyna, S.V. (2012). Motivation of intellectual workers. Perm University Herald. Economy, 3. 82-89 [in Russian].
28.Sharp, H., Hall, T., Baddoo, N., & Beecham, S. (2007). Exploring motivational differences between software developers and project managers. The 6th Joint Meeting on European software en-gineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium
on the foundations of software engineering: companion papers. Retrieved from https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/2299/990/1/S71.pdf.
29.Vasylyk, A.V. (2009). The labour activity intellectualization in the context of intellectual capital forming and development. Manuscript. Kyiv: KNEU. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].
30.The World Bank (2016, August 10). World Development Indicators. Retri¬eved from http://datacatalog.worldbank.org/
31.Amosha, A.Y., Vyshnevskyj, V.P., Zbarazska, L.A. (2012). Neoindustrialization and new industrial policy. Ekon. promisl., 1-2, 3-33 [in Russian].
32.Vyshnevskyj, V.P. (Ed.) (2014). Industry and industrial policy of Ukraine 2013: current trends, challenges, opportunities: scientific and annual report. Part I. Ekon. promisl., 2 (66), 80-131 [in Russian].
33.State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Ukraine in Figures: 2015. In I.M. Zuk (Ed.) [in Ukrainian].
34.State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2011). The use of ICT in the Ukraine. Statistical bulletin Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
35.State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). The use of ICT in the Ukraine. Statistical bulletin Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
36.Subbotyna, I.Y. (2013). Forming of qualitative human capital: selection, motivation and the intellectualization of labor resources. Journal of economic regulation, 4, 55-62.
37.Mochernyy, S.V. (Ed.) (2000). Economic encyclopedia: in 3 volumes. V. 3 Kyiv: Vydavnychyy tsentr “Akademiya”. 864 p.
38.Fedoseev, V.V., Garmash, A.N., & Dayitbergov, D.M. (1999). Economic and mathematical methods and applied models: a scientific manual for universities. YuNITI, 391 pp.
39.Horfynkel, V.Ja., & Shvandara, V.A. (2007). Enterprise economy: a scientific manual for universities. JuNYTY-DANA. 670 pp.
